My favourite particle: the photon

Also at The Guardian.

The fundamental particles

The fundamental particles we have identified so far.

I was talking to my daughter about a star she saw out of her bedroom window the other morning. Actually it was Venus. She had learned at school that some of the stars we see aren’t there any more, because the light from them takes so long to reach us. So we are looking back in time when we look up to the sky. My dad told me when I was little that the light from the sun takes 8 minutes to reach us, and I haven’t stopped thinking about photons since.

We consider photons to be light, because that is clearly what they are most useful for in our world. They are also wifi and radio and microwave and x-ray. Wonderful things. So we need photons to see, to communicate and to cook disgusting baked potatoes.

Even with the advent of wifi, which I’m not sure I could live without, visible light is probably the photon at its best. We with our eyes are practically superheroes. We can get a good idea of the composition of a material just by turning our head towards it. My desk is brown in daylight because it is made of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, which tend to spit out not very many (aka low intensity) photons of a mixture of colours at the yellowish end of the spectrum. The atoms spit out photons when they are excited, which happens because they have absorbed ‘daylight photons’, from the sun. I think this is a bit like an atom’s version of having a pick-me-up of some sort, feeling a bit queer and vomiting. What goes out is not exactly what went in, it has its own properties, but there is a relationship between the two that is altered according to the properties of the vomiter.

Daylight photons have in turn been vomited up by the sun, fat and bloated with energy from all its nuclear burning and particle-antiparticle annihilations. Yes, that’s probably enough with the vomiting analogy. Photons are made in stars like our sun. They carry energy off, and they don’t get involved with the interactions. All other fundamental particles are rather difficult in comparison. They all demand conservation of something typical to them, which puts limits on the kinds of things that can happen between them. These limits are what give us the universe we have, with planets and stuff, so I’m not knocking them.

 

The sun

The sun.

 

We can only really look back in time as far as the point when photons were set free from the hot mess of plasma that used to be our universe. The photons emitted then have been traveling for billions of years through their expanding universe. This seems incredible, as does the fact we can see and hear some of these same photons as the interference you get when your telly isn’t tuned in properly.

But to me the most remarkable thing about photons is that they don’t do time. A photon is traveling through the vacuum of space at three hundred million meters a second. Relativity tells us that when an object’s speed approaches the speed of light (relative to us), time dilates (slows down) for it (relative to us). For a photon moving at the speed of light, the passage of time slows to nothing. The universe is eternally frozen in mid-sentence. Nothing happening, time not passing, a bit like living in the northwest suburbs of Illinois.

Posted in My Favourite Particle, Particle Physics, Physics, Science | Comments Off on My favourite particle: the photon

The sound of science

Also at the Guardian.

For some reason it has taken me about 3000 years to get around to writing this post. Seeing Jon last week at CERN has finally collapsed me into the right state to do so.

Paddington station has pink and yellow lines taped to the floor to indicate the way to the Hammersmith & city and circle lines. This fills me with joy because it is so useful and simple. At CERN there is some black tape on the floor in building 500 which is labelled “SPS”. I think it indicates where the Super Proton Synchrotron is positioned, deep under the building. It’s exciting, but perhaps lacks any real use.

I think I’m scared that LHCsound may still be at a similar stage. My hopes for the project are limitless, but as of yet we are perhaps a bit too vague and out of focus for me to be really happy to talk about it in a scientific context.

 

Sonification means making informative sounds. Police sirens and fire alarms are the most basic form of this; they are a very general warning that something bad is happening and you should get out of the way. Heart monitors used in hospitals give you a little bit more information- they warn you if the heart stops beating and they also tell you how fast it is going. We naturally associate high-pitched sounds with fast-moving objects and loud noises with danger, and we have an extraordinary (in my opinion, uncanny) ability to agree on what sounds “good”.

 

I want to use my ears to help me understand the data being collected by the ATLAS detector. There are an infinite number of ways this could be done- do we map different types of particle to different instruments? Pitch to energy? Should calorimeter noise only be sent to my left ear? What information can we convey using only a French horn? I still don’t know, but I’m really enjoying thinking about it and in the mean time have been totally blown away by The Creative Ones getting their rock on with data.

 

Posted in Particle Physics, Physics, Science | Tagged | Comments Off on The sound of science

Sci-fi, sex education, Michael Faraday and teenage angst

At The Guardian.

Posted in Politics, Rambling, Writing | Comments Off on Sci-fi, sex education, Michael Faraday and teenage angst

Large Hadron Collider to continue running through 2012

At the Guardian. See also Chapter 4.7 of Smashing Physics.

Posted in Particle Physics, Physics, Science | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Large Hadron Collider to continue running through 2012