Cuts, Commitments, and Contradictions

After my previous post on the parliamentary committees last week, I think it is worth highlighing this blog post by Lucien Heurtier.

Lucien is a postdoctoral research associate in theoretical physics at King’s College London. As well as having a valuable perspective on the committee meetings I discussed, he was also one of the group of fellows and early career researchers who signed letters (here and here) about the cuts to particle, astro and nuclear physics. As such, he had a meeting last Tuesday with Sir Ian Chapman and Prof Michele Dougherty (heads of UKRI and STFC respectively) and Prof Grahame Blair (STFC’s Executive Director of Programmes). I found his account of that meeting quite revealing.

Continue reading
Posted in Arts, Politics, Science Policy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Select committees

Well, the fight to stop the decimation of particle, astro and nuclear physics continues.

The House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology select committee session I mentioned in the previous post happened. The above picture is one of the lighter moments in what was an intense couple of hours.

I thought the committee were impressively well informed and on point in their questioning, both of us and of Michele Dougherty, the executive chair of STFC. You can read the transcript, and if you’re really keen watch the recording, on the official parliament site. I think a lot of important information came out. There is a good write-up by Frances Jones in Research Professional, for example.

Also significant was the appearance of the Science Minister, Lord Vallance, and the Secretary of State Liz Kendall, in the House of Lords Science and Technology committee the day before. You can see the transcript and recording here.

The most interesting exchange I took away from this was:

Continue reading
Posted in Politics, Science Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

A trip to the House of Commons

Having had a very interesting meeting at the House of Lords a couple of weeks ago, this Wednesday I will be giving evidence on science funding to the House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee.

Big changes are being implemented in the way UKRI allocates taxpayers money to fund research in national laboratories and universities. While the intentions may be good (and the total amount of money being allocated has not shrunk), the changes are being implemented without a good understanding of their impact.

There have already been huge negative effects on particle, astro and nuclear physics. Because they happen to sit in the Science and Technology Facilities Council – the same research council which runs national facilties for the whole of UKRI – they are being drastically cut in order to fund increased costs at those facilities.

I am very glad the committee are looking into this. I hope the session helps UKRI, STFC and the ministry think again.

https://committees.parliament.uk/event/26683/formal-meeting-oral-evidence-session/

Posted in Politics, Science Policy | Tagged , | Comments Off on A trip to the House of Commons

These cuts to physics research will be a disaster for UK scientists – and for our standing in the world

Back in the Guardian after a long break. Sadly it is because of bad news. More like 2008 than 2012.

“If plans by the UK’s science funding body go ahead, we won’t be able to benefit from Britain’s membership of Cern and other large international projects”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/16/cuts-physics-research-uk-scientists-britain-cern

Posted in Politics, Science Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on These cuts to physics research will be a disaster for UK scientists – and for our standing in the world